Big data is the process of collecting, analyzing, and utilizing data, which is necessary for the development of many kinds of technologies that are already highly-integrated into the daily lives of many people. The concept of data ownership is often used to be the basis to support the efforts to regulate big data. This point of view argues that data has a number of elements of ownership that needs to be recognized by intellectual property law but does not clearly explain the conceptual connection of data, big data, and intellectual property. Using the normative legal research method, this article found out that the integration of intellectual property elements into the conceptualization of big data regulation could threaten the antitrust or business competition climate in Indonesia. Additionally, the normative space for big data regulations through the intellectual property rights perspective is still too small to be comprehensively described and still needs more concrete evidence from the actual utilization of big data itself. This research aims at providing points of normative reference for future studies on the potentials and risks of regulating big data under the framework of intellectual property law.Big data merupakan proses pengumpulan, analisis dan pemanfaatan data yang berperan penting dalam perkembangan berbagai macam teknologi yang sudah sangat terintegrasi dalam kehidupan masyarakat. Konsep kepemilikan data merupakan konsep yang kerap dijadikan dasar dalam upaya meregulasi big data. Sudut pandang ini berargumen bahwa data memiliki unsur kepemilikan yang harus dihormati olehhukum kekayaan intelektual, namun tidak secara jelas menjelaskan konseptualisasi antara data, big data, dan kekayaan intelektual. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menemukan adanya pelekatan nilai kekayaan intelektual ke dalam konseptualisasi pengaturan big data, yang mana dapat mengancam iklim persaingan usaha di Indonesia dan secara normatif pengaturan big data melalui hak kekayaan intelektual masih sangat kecil untuk dijabarkan dan membutuhkan bukti yang lebih konkret dari pemanfaatan big data itu sendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan rekomendasi secara normatif untuk penelitian di masa mendatang mengenai peluang dan risiko pengaturan big data dalam kerangka hukum kekayaan intelektual.
Investment apps have become an important part of the investment culture throughout the world and have helped democratize investment opportunities for many people. The utilization of investment apps in Indonesia has opened many doors for Indonesians to invest their wealth and obtain many different kinds of assets, posing cybersecurity risks that threaten the interests of their users. This study aims to analyze and provide literature for possible future legislation that affects the utilization of investment apps. Using the normative legal research method, this study analyzes the intersection of investment law and consumer protection law in Indonesia in the context of the utilization of investment apps. Through the statutory approach, this study finds that the normative restrictions within the respective laws make it difficult to properly define legal liability for many kinds of problems that can arise from cybersecurity risks in the context of the utilization of investment apps. The findings of this article serve as a contribution to the constantly expanding literature for Indonesian legal development, specifically on the quest to adapt to the changes brought about by the latest technologies.Aplikasi investasi telah menjadi bagian penting dari budaya investasi di seluruh dunia dan telah membantu mendemokratisasi peluang investasi bagi banyak orang. Penggunaan aplikasi investasi di Indonesia telah membuka banyak pintu bagi masyarakatIndonesia untuk menginvestasikan kekayaan mereka dan mendapatkan berbagai jenis aset, yang menimbulkan risiko keamanan siber yang mengancam kepentingan penggunanya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menyediakan literatur untuk kemungkinan legislasi di masa depan yang mempengaruhi pemanfaatan aplikasi investasi. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, penelitian ini menganalisis persinggungan antara hukum investasi dan hukum perlindungan konsumen di Indonesia dalam konteks pemanfaatan aplikasi investasi. Melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa pembatasan normatif dalam masing-masing undang-undang menyulitkan untuk mendefinisikan pertanggungjawaban hukum secara tepat untuk berbagai jenis masalah yang dapat timbul dari risiko keamanan siber dalam konteks penggunaan aplikasi investasi. Temuan dari artikel ini berfungsi sebagai kontribusi terhadap literatur yang terus berkembang untuk pengembangan hukum di Indonesia, khususnya dalam upaya untuk beradaptasi dengan perubahan yang dibawa oleh teknologi terbaru.
Indonesia possesses significant potential to enhance and expand its halal industry, leveraging its unique cultural assets from many of its indigenous communities. One of the ways to ensure the growth of the halal industry is the facilitation of IPR protection through the legal framework. Using a normative method supported by a statutory approach, this research analyzed the challenges and potentials of integrating halal certification into the communal IPR system in Indonesia. The analysis found many restrictions within the existing positive laws which can prevent the integration of halal certification into the communal IPR system. This research proposed a model of communal IPR according to the challenges identified, along with the normative construction needed to establish it. This model mainly focused on providing normative spaces for the integration of sharia compliance while also making sure that the purposes of IPR protection are fulfilled.
The discovery of technology has a huge impact on the economy of a country, so many countries focus on developing technology and apply this technology in their respective countries. Technological inventions must register patent rights to obtain legal protection to avoid losses that will harm inventors, stimulate creativity in creating new technologies and create fair business competition among companies engaged in technology. This normative research aims to compare patent protection in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong. The benefit of this research is that it can contribute to scientific literature in the field of patent rights, can provide an overview of the form of patent rights arrangements in several countries outside Indonesia, so as to avoid disputes and/or misunderstandings with other countries. The participation of Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong in ratifying the Convention on the World Trade Organization and the agreement on the Trade Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) obliges these countries to establish regulations on patents in their respective countries. Although the application of patent law in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong is based on the terms of the TRIPs agreement, the implementation and regulations must have differences. Patent registration in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have the same procedure, namely fulfilling the formal requirements, substantive examination, then the announcement stage. The term of patent protection in Indonesia and Singapore is similar, which is 20 years from the date of filing. However, it is different from Hong Kong, namely from the date of filing. In patent disputes, there are two ways of settlement, namely litigation and non-litigation. Patents in Indonesia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have another similarity, namely that they are transferable and can be licensed. The focus of this research is only to compare the application of patent law and not to examine its strengths and weaknesses, so it is considered important to do further research on this matter.
In Indonesia, the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition or Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) is granted the power according to Law Number 5 of 1999 but such a power cannot be optimally implemented. KPPU often experiences difficulties and obstacles in the process of enforcing business competition law due to a large number of business actors and uncooperative witnesses so that this hinders the process of examining cases. In particular, KPPU has lack of cooperation of involved parties during the inspection process. However, the KPPU in carrying out its authority can include the role of the Indonesian police to assist in the process of enforcing business competition law. This paper shows that the role of the Indonesian police in the enforcement of business competition law can be initiated during the investigation process if the KPPU requests assistance to present the reported party, witnesses, and expert witnesses. Until the decision is issued by the KPPU, investigators can follow up with relevant individuals that may have cases that contain criminal aspects.

